Physical entities
The things your business actually operates.
Facilities, people, vendors, devices, vehicles, products, accounts, documents, cases, alerts, payments, shipments, and locations.
Stratir ontology mapping
Stratir does not sell a fixed ontology.
We map your business ontologically.
Stratir translates the physical entities, systems, workflows, and decisions you already operate into a logical environment that people and AI can inspect, reason over, and act through.
/01
Data + logic + action connected to existing infrastructure
Physical entities
Facilities, people, vendors, devices, vehicles, products, accounts, documents, cases, alerts, payments, shipments, and locations.
Logical environment
Objects, properties, links, states, permissions, confidence labels, source history, and decision context.
Operational loop
Escalations, approvals, tasking, writebacks, reporting, enrichment, simulations, and review gates connected to existing systems.
Requirements before tools
Stratir builds the operating layer between buyer requirements, scattered sources, analyst judgment, and agentic engineering. Ontological mapping is how we make that layer legible: the entities, systems, evidence, rules, owners, and actions already inside a business are connected into a model that can be inspected, tested, and used to solve hard problems.
Object grammar
The useful ontology map is not a data catalog. It is a shared operating language for the business: what exists, how it relates, what changed, who can act, and what evidence supports the next move.
01
Customers, assets, selectors, alerts, shipments, accounts, employees, vendors, incidents, orders, and other operational nouns.
02
Status, owner, confidence, source, geography, risk, timestamp, criticality, lineage, and operational state.
03
Owns, supplies, touches, belongs to, transacts with, reports to, depends on, resembles, triggers, and conflicts with.
04
Open case, stage decision, update system, request review, reallocate resource, notify owner, preserve source, or escalate.
Elements of a decision
This is the center of the page: not a software claim, but a modeling discipline. The map should show the business where a decision gets its evidence, which logic shapes it, and how it becomes an action.
01
The observations, records, live signals, and source material already spread across operational systems.
ERP and CRM records
IoT and edge telemetry
Documents and unstructured notes
Geospatial and case context
02
The rules, models, analyst reasoning, calculations, and business constraints that determine what a decision means.
Forecast models
Risk rules
Analyst tradecraft
Optimization and planning logic
03
The governed execution layer: what gets written back, escalated, reviewed, assigned, approved, or stopped.
Case escalation
System writeback
Review gates
Operator workflows
Live ontology fabric
Entities, states, relationships, decisions
Entity
01
Logic
02
Action
03
Persistent operating context
Relationships, system state, evidence, and action paths should remain available in the background of work. An ontology map is only useful when it clarifies the decision rather than becoming another thing to manage.
Build path
Stratir keeps the map narrow enough to pilot and strong enough to expand. The first version should answer a real question, expose missing links, and prove that the logical environment improves work.
01
Name the decision, owner, consequence, systems involved, and what a useful answer must change.
02
Map the physical entities, business systems, source surfaces, data stores, models, and teams already in motion.
03
Choose the smallest set of objects, properties, links, states, and confidence rules that explain the workflow.
04
Attach business rules, models, calculations, and analyst methods where they can be inspected and reused.
05
Connect recommendations to approvals, escalations, writebacks, tasking, and human review.
06
Run the model against live work, measure whether decisions improve, and refine the ontology map.
Where it applies
Use case
01
Suppliers, plants, shipments, materials, orders, lead times, demand signals, and reallocations modeled as one operating picture.
Use case
02
Customers, accounts, devices, payments, communications, alerts, cases, and evidence connected for defensible investigation.
Use case
03
Assets, users, events, vulnerabilities, controls, incidents, threat actors, and response tasks mapped for reviewable action.
Use case
04
Accounts, contracts, pipeline, usage, support, invoices, renewals, and account risk tied to intervention logic.
Why it matters
The model preserves relationships between things instead of forcing every workflow into a narrow reporting schema.
Agents and copilots can query the same logical environment that analysts and operators use to make decisions.
Confidence, permissions, provenance, and review gates stay close to every recommendation and action.
The goal is not to replace operational infrastructure. It is to make that infrastructure legible, connected, and actionable.
Ontology pilots
Start with a concrete decision that is currently slowed by fragmented data, unclear ownership, missing context, or systems that do not talk to each other.
Scope an ontology mapping pilot